Showing posts with label Hankel loop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hankel loop. Show all posts

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Analytic Continuation of the Lerch Transcendent

We define the following important Dirichlet series as the Lerch transcendent,
Φ(z,s,a) := sum_[n=0 to +infinity] (z^n)/(n+a)^s , a {0}∪Z^- ; s C for |z|<1 and Re(s)>1 when |z|=1

Note that z=1 gives the Hurwitz zeta function, and a=0 gives the s-logarithm of z as notable special cases (and with a=1 this is just the Riemann zeta function).
In the case when z=exp (2πiλ) we have the Lerch (or periodic) zeta function,
L(λ,s,a) := sum_[n=0 to +infinity] (e^(2πiλn))/(n+a)^s

We have the following integral representation for Φ,
Φ(z,s,a)Γ(s) = sum_[n=0 to +infinity] (z^n) integral_[0 to +infinity] (t^(s-1)).e^(-(n+a)t) dt , for Re(a)>0, Re(s)>0
with the change of variable t := (n+a)t in the Euler integral representation for the Gamma function.
We now interchange sum and integral (which is justified here) to get,
Φ(z,s,a)Γ(s) = integral_[0 to +infinity] (t^(s-1)).e^(-at) sum_[n=0 to +infinity] (z.e^(-t))^n dt
The sum within the integral is a geometric series, and on summing we have our identity,

Φ(z,s,a)Γ(s) = integral_[0 to +infinity] [(t^(s-1)).e^(-at) / (1 - z.e^(-t))] dt
for Re(a)>0; |z|≤1, z≠1, Re(s)>0; z=1, Re(s)>1

This suggest a contour integral of the form,

(2πi).I(z,s,a) := integral_[H] (t^(s-1)).e^(at) / (1 - z.e^t) dt

Where H is a Hankel contour where,
H= C_1 ∪ C_2 ∪ C_3
and C_1 is the portion of H which travels in a straight line from +infinity just under the positive real axis, which then connects to C_2 which traverses a semi-circle of radius ρ0 which again connects to C_3 which returns to +infinity just above the positive real axis.

So with C_1 parametrised by t=r.e^(-πi) , C_2 parametrised by t=ρ.e^(iθ) and C_3 parametrised by t=r.e^(πi) , we have,

(2πi).I(z,s,a) = integral_[+infinity to ρ] [[r^(s-1).e^(-πis).e^(πi).e^(-πi).e^(-ra)] / (1 - z.e^(-r))] dr +
integral_[-π to +π] [[ρ^(s-1).e^(sθi).e^(-θi).e^(aρ.e^(iθ)).ρi.e^(iθ)] / (1 - z.e^(ρ.e^(iθ)))] dθ +
integral_[ρ to +infinity] [[r^(s-1).e^(πis).e^(-πi).e^(πi).e^(-ra)] / (1 - z.e^(-r))] dr

On simplifying,
(2πi).I(z,s,a) = (e^(πis) - e^(-πis)).integral_[ρ to +infinity] [r^(s-1).e^(-ra) / (1 - z.e^(-r))] dr + i(ρ^s). integral_[-π to +π] [e^(iθs + aρ.e^(iθ)) / (1 - z.e^(ρe^(iθ)))] dθ

The last integral in θ tends to 0 as ρ->0 (in the region to which we continue to, *details to be supplied).
We then have,

lim_[ρ->0] I(z,s,a) = (sin (πs) / π) Φ(z,s,a)Γ(s)

Recalling the formula Γ(s)Γ(1-s) = (π / sin (πs)) gives the contour integral representation,

Φ(z,s,a) = [Γ(1-s) / (2πi)] integral_[H] [t^(s-1).e^(at) / (1 - z.e^t)] dt ------- (1)
Re(a)>0, |arg(-t)| =< π

cf.